Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Books on May-December romance and Age Gap Relationships


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. R e  dwolf24  (talk) 20:13, 2 October 2005 (UTC)

Books on May-December romance and Age Gap Relationships
Listcruft, unencyclopedic, impossible to maintain, not much use WCFrancis 06:44, 24 September 2005 (UTC) *Delete topic could be an article but a booklist is unnecessary. Dlyons493 07:47, 24 September 2005 (UTC) "Merge to Age disparity in sexual relationships since that exists Dlyons493 10:36, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - can't be completed. Has barely been started, in fact. CLW 07:11, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-encylopedic list. utcursch | talk 07:56, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, no reason readers shouldn't be able to find examples of this kind of book, completeness is unnecessary. Kappa 10:24, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment List of movies featuring May-December romances survived a deletion nomination in August.
 * Delete as completely idiosyncratic non-topic. Dpbsmith (talk) 10:26, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak delete Why these two similar-but-not-really-related topics in one article? It's kind of like having a "List of books about the Spanish Civil War and the Cuban Missle Crisis".  Also, at present there are only two entries.  Perhaps they could be stuck in the bibliography section of some article, but I think this should go. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  10:50, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete useless list. Wile E. Heresiarch 02:28, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Listcruft. / Peter Isotalo 04:58, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Listcuft is okay. Nick Dillinger 07:25, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.