Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bookselves


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  19:23, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Bookselves

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Only one source The Daily California provides any non-trivial RS coverage of us. At this point, just another fledgling business with no real notability yet. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - Major sources only relate to a point that has nothing to do with company, really. Only source to talk about the company is a college paper. No. DreamGuy (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:43, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: An article on a new start-up venture, sourced largely to its own blog, aside from one pre-launch start-up pitch-piece on what they plan to do. Fails WP:NWEB, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 08:00, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Do NOT Delete: This article by Berkeleyside - a major publication on the East Bay (San Francisco Bay Area) provides credible citation for the startup. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yashmahendra (talk • contribs) — Yashmahendra (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete per WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:AUD. Might be a case of WP:TOOSOON.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:05, 8 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.