Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Booksontrains


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Mackensen (talk) 21:47, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Booksontrains


non notable websites Aququa 22:49, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, unverifiable (google searche for "booksontrains" on nme.com returns nothing; dannywallace.com results are forum posts promoting the site). Carries all the telltale signs of self-promotion. Demiurge 22:58, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above; WP:V. Eusebeus 01:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:WEB. - Mailer Diablo 03:54, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, I see no evidence of mainstream media exposure, or anything else that would indicate notability. AdorableRuffian 11:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. WMMartin 17:56, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, it's a cute idea, but has no place here. Fairly obvious (self-)promotion. --Arvedui 02:14, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.