Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Booksox


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. kingboyk 16:16, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Booksox
Publicity -- Szvest 20:21, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Delete Non notable advertisement--Zxcvbnm 21:35, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

''This AfD is being relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that a decision may usefully be reached. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!'' kingboyk 11:09, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. Also, unsourced. PJM 11:29, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. Yeah, it's unsourced, but it may be verifiable.  I just wouldn't care.  Mangojuice 12:19, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete this one as adcruft too. -- E lkman - (talk) 13:06, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as nn, advertisement. Colon el Tom 00:57, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not going to bother adding a comment, as I already did in Articles for deletion/Book sox.  Is there any way to bundle two nominations together into one after they've both been made? --Icarus 04:08, 26 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.