Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boolean SAT/SMT Solver Foundational Lectures 2011


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Spam for a future event is as good a reason as any. &mdash; RHaworth 02:23, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Boolean SAT/SMT Solver Foundational Lectures 2011

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Obvious WP:NOT violation, with a side of WP:NOBLECAUSE. Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  01:21, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Userfy / transwiki - if they want to contribute to articles based on the material covered at the lectures / conference, they're welcome to do so, and if they'd like to organize it, it should be done through a page outside mainspace. If they want to write a textbook on the topic, it sounds like just the thing for wikibooks. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 16:50, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * reply "This Wikipedia page will act as a knowledge-base of all the lecture materials provided by over 40+ top-class researchers in SAT/SMT solver research and related areas. Lecture materials include title/abstract, lecture notes and video. Each lecturer is free to upload any relevant biographical information including, but not limited to, links to their research websites. Lecturers may also add additional materials such homework assignments, projects, and information about future research directions. This page will be maintained communally by the lecturers." There's no way to permit this casual use of us as their webhost and data storage facility. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  00:19, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:03, 2 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete. I have to agree with Orangey on this one. This isn't a Wikipedia article. Also I think CSD G11 may apply but instead of closing it that way I'm going to speedy tag it and see what another admin has to say. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:38, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.