Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boomphones


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 06:51, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Boomphones

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable company. All the sources are reviews of their headphones that turn into a boombox. Maybe the headphones are notable, but if so they should have their own article and this one should be deleted. As notability isn't inherited. Adamant1 (talk) 10:48, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:02, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:02, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - I see sources from Gizmodo and Digital Trends that are independent of the company. Interstellarity (talk) 13:02, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment Both are product reviews. Which I said are out there. The question is does that mean the company should have an article if it's not notable, but their products are, instead of just the product having an article. I'd say no. Especially if one of your examples is the Gizmodo article. Which doesn't even discuss the company at all. Let alone is the review in-depth. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:24, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 06:08, 20 May 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability. I too can see sources in other publications but none provide any in-depth information *about* *the* *company* which is the topic of this article. This topic therefore fails GNG/WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 14:58, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   07:40, 28 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.