Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boone Jenner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 00:04, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Boone Jenner

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Expired prod that should have been deleted but an editor removed the prod because I forgot an edit summary. Non-notable junior player who has yet to play professionally and fails WP:NSPORTS can be recreated when/if he achieves notability. DJSasso (talk) 22:47, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions.  —DJSasso (talk) 22:58, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per norm--Mo Rock...Monstrous (talk) 23:08, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete until drafted and playing for major league club. First Light (talk) 23:37, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Can't find anything that would remotely satisfy NHOCKEY at this point.  Can be re-created when the subject does.  Patken4 (talk) 01:18, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: Undrafted 17 year old doesn't remotely satisfy WP:NHOCKEY.  Ravenswing  13:21, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Joaquin008  ( talk ) 10:19, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Week keep - Even though he has played in the Under-17 Worlds he does not qualify under WP:NHOCKEY, but he does meet the minimum requirements of WP:GNP. I found this 2009 Hockey News article which focused on Boone Jenner. This qualifies as a reliable and independent source, and taken with all of the hockey sites that have him listed and mentioned, it is enough for general notability requirements. And from what I have read he will be playing in the NHL very soon, so this article will just need to be recreated anyway, so why delete it now? Moorsmur (talk) 03:23, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * WP:GNP is an essay that was based on the old WP:ATHLETE which a couple months ago was replaced by WP:NSPORTS, so the athlete section of that essay is out of date. WP:CRYSTAL is why we don't create it now because lots of junior level players who are said to play in the NHL soon never actually reach that level. Sometimes for talent level, sometimes for accidents or injuries. Undeleting the article when they are notable is not difficult. Also a single news article is not sufficient to meet the notability guidelines, you need multiple ones that feature significant coverage of them. Various sites that just list him or his stats are not considered enough to meet notability. -DJSasso (talk) 14:41, 6 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Might be notable in the future, but for now, they aren't. Jmlk  1  7  08:15, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.