Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boost Drinks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Michig (talk) 09:41, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Boost Drinks

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article fails to meet the the notability guidelines. A Google search brings just three articles:, and , which I believe is not enough to be "significant coverage". (talk) 17:20, 28 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.   (talk) 17:20, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:40, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:40, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Rcsprinter123    (orate)  @ 21:19, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Keep and Improve - Small company seems notable for its sales. Also search for the founder brings up quite a few additional entries -  --George100 (talk) 03:36, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep & Improve per above, Passes GNG- The article simply needs improving not deleting . – Davey 2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 07:00, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michig (talk) 07:56, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep and rename to Boost (energy drink) as "Boost" applies to multiple drink products including Boost (beverage) about the Nestle product line (which I've PRODded, but moving this one would probably make sense even if that one is deleted). The article as it is stinks but I'm seeing enough sources to pass WP:CORPDEPTH/WP:PRODUCT even without the sources all about the founder (which are usually more appropriate for an article about the founder). --&mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 06:59, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.