Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bootdryer

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete -- Joolz 23:28, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

Bootdryer
Not really notable. 148.78.243.50 01:36, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Provisional keep pending evidence of non-notability. Kappa 02:17, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. This article lacks evidence of notability, which is the only possible evidence of non-notability.  Also, the term "Thermicair" pushes it into the category of spam.  --A D Monroe III 03:06, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
 * I think it's meant to be "thermic air". Kappa 12:55, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Even then, proper English would be "thermal", not "thermic", which stil means nothing more than "warm". "Thermicair" and "Thermic air" are marketing slogans.  This article is either spam or a copy of spam.  --A D Monroe III 15:12, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: Illiterate and self-evident.  A boot dryer, not a bootdryer, and a boot dryer is a device to, um, dry boots.  Otherwise known as a modified heater.  Geogre 05:43, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, boot dryers probably deserve an article, but this is a self-evident dicdef. I'd be happy to reconsider if someone rewrites into a decent stub that does more than state the obvious. - Mgm|(talk) 11:10, September 10, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. The burden of proof is on the article's author to supply references that back up their claims. Will change my mind under similar circumstances as Mgm. Fernando Rizo T/C 18:27, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as self-evident obviosity. Thereare notenough spaces in thearticle, either, but Isuppose it couldbe re written. -Splash 21:20, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per ADM3 and others. What the heck is "evidence of non-notability", Kappa?  Barno 20:10, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
 * E.g. a failed google test. Kappa 20:21, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.