Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bootloop

Bootloop

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

There is no substance to the article. In its current state, it's little more than a dictionary entry, to which I feel the need to remind that we are not a dictionary.  TrueCRaysball 💬 00:22, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  TrueCRaysball  💬 00:22, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect Booting, unlikely to escape being a DICTDEF, no need to delete when it's missing at the target. Widefox ; talk 09:46, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep while I do agree this is likely a WP:PERMASTUB, I do not think it is a dictionary definition. Merging it with booting makes it far harder to find. I think this is a common tech problem that deserves its own article, and it meets the WP:GNG. PhotographyEdits (talk) 09:54, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
 * The redirect would be left behind for ease. Isn't that a WP:USEFUL argument (one not to use in a deletion discussion)? Widefox ; talk 14:34, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect with Booting per Widefox's rationale, unless the article is expanded to contain more than a dictionary definition and (for some reason) a list of operating systems. Milkk7 (talk) 12:56, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep I updated the article with a $24 billion example failure. --Ancheta Wis   (talk  &#124; contribs) 13:05, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment I copyedited to be in line with the article / WP:RECENTISM. It is still a stub plus a list of examples. Conceptually, it is a failure subtopic of booting, and there's no need to split that based on size. Widefox ; talk 13:45, 20 July 2024 (UTC)