Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boozefighters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Going with keeps. Please improve with provided sources. Missvain (talk) 18:13, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Boozefighters

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article has been tagged for years. There is no inherent notability in this line of business, there are no reliable secondary sources attesting to the importance of the organization--nor can I find any. Not notable by our standards. Drmies (talk) 01:04, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:20, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:20, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:20, 11 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Would an emeritus Professor of Criminal Justice at Eastern Kentucky University suffice? &#9786; Uncle G (talk) 13:14, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Hmm I'd rather have a set of articles and book chapters from reliable sources providing in-depth discussion of the subject. Or, barring that, a box of Merci chocolates. Drmies (talk) 03:07, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment – Below are some sources and access to sources:
 * Here is an entire 288-page book about the Boozefighters, published by Motorbooks, which is an imprint of The Quarto Group
 * Here are five pages that covers the organization here and there, along with conveying information about other clubs, in Biker Gangs and Organized Crime, published by Elsevier Science
 * As These search results indicate, the Boozefighters have received coverage in a lot of different books.
 * Per these search results at Google News Archive, the organization has received a fair amount of press coverage through the years
 * It would take some time to go through each book and news source from these search results to discern the level of coverage in each one, and whether or not it is significant or below the threshold of significant coverage. This is due in part to preview availability being inconsistent at times. Hence my commenting here at this time, rather than !voting. Any takers? "What do you got?
 * – North America1000 16:15, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Hmmm don't know how I missed that, User:Northamerica1000. Thanks. Drmies (talk) 20:58, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 00:24, 19 April 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep First page of search gets an Amazon link to that 288 page book, I'm in. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 11:23, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  03:21, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep A historic, international organization, notable and notorious, and as shown above, with sources to prove it. Alan Islas (talk) 04:55, 7 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.