Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bopsta


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-01 07:51Z 

Bopsta

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Does not appear to meet WP:WEB. I got no hits on Google News, which leads me to believe there aren't a lot of independent articles about it. The site gets a ton of Google hits, but only twenty of them are unique. The site contains no original content. All videos are linked from other sources, such as YouTube and Google Video. The site's former name, "Google Idol" gets a good number of hits, but they're all blogs and ads. Again, no usable sources. The article is written like an ad. --Djrobgordon 05:45, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages because they contain the results of individual    competitions hosted on this page:


 * Delete all. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 05:51, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete This one fails to meet WP:WEB. - Denny 05:54, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete As per above -- † Ðy§ep§ion † Speak your mind 07:08, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom. Few independent sources = non-notable, non-verifiable. -- Chairman S. Talk  Contribs  07:12, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep the main Bopsta article (see the "Bopsta in the media" section at the end of the article), but delete the rest. -- Black Falcon 21:26, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Use the sources listed in the "Bopsta in the media" section to write a sourced, verifiable article for purposes of Attribution... delete if this is not done before the end of AfD by someone with an interest in the subject. Delete OR Blank and Redirect all sub-articles to the main article. -- saberwyn 22:52, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom. Not notable. Does not meet web and notability guidelines. Big  top  02:03, 25 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.