Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boraie Development (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 18:30, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Boraie Development
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

As it stands, the article is heavily promotional, containing a list of bulleted projects and multiple buzz language. Apart from that, the article is mostly supported by regional news in NJ/NY. Looking through both search and G-News, I found publications here, here and here that are somewhat from non-regional sources, but those are also iffy. Just glancing at sourcing, the subject appears to be notable, but upon review, it doesn't satisfy WP:ORG and is highly advertorial at that. Jppcap (talk) 13:05, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 13:35, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 13:36, 16 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete -The article is relatively promotional, and even though it has a fair amount of news, its a real estate firm and the press/the article do not assert the topic's importance S3venevan (talk) 04:02, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - The news stories are all incidental mentions of the company, even the one about the founder, which focuses mostly on him and not his company. No reporter or editor has seen fit to profile the company itself, and it has not been the subject of any controversy or anything beyond doing its job of building things. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 04:47, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.