Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Border Legion (Shannara)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Callahorn. Uncontentious close by original author Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 23:28, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Border Legion (Shannara)

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

This page consists entirely of WP:NOT description of a fictional element of the Shannara series, laden with references to the books themselves. Not a single secondary source can be found on this topic. Why? Because the premise in the lead, that "The Border Legion played a significant role in two novels of the trilogy", is false. I read, and greatly enjoyed, the Shannara books, and I know that the Border Legion is not important even as a plot device. The page is the time-intensive original research of a single user, as exemplified by this edit. Deprodded. Abductive (reasoning) 05:52, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge to Callahorn as a short summary. 76.66.203.138 (talk) 06:01, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge without redirect to Callahorn seems natural, not that that article doesn't have its own issues. &mdash;chaos5023 (talk) 06:45, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - I don't think "merge without redirect" is actually an option due to how page history stuff needs to be preserved. NotARealWord (talk) 23:27, 13 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Wow, coincidences – I was logged out and went to this article for the first time in ages to find it at AfD. I wrote it long before I knew (and/or cared) about NOT#PLOT, OR etc. Clear delete or redirect to Callahorn. As a side note, I think(?) I was referring to the Legion being important in Sword and the Free Corps in Elfstones, but it's been so long I don't remember. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 15:37, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 21:14, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Callahorn, I don't think there's enough relevant content for a merge.--hkr (talk) 14:10, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect per the Ed, Sadads (talk) 00:09, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect -That way, if there is any content worth merging, it can still be merged. NotARealWord (talk) 23:27, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.