Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Borel's law of large numbers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge by WP:SNOW. AfD is not for merger proposals. Bearian (talk) 18:10, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Borel's law of large numbers

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This is apparently the same thing as Law of large numbers. No reason for two articles on the same topic. Dondegroovily (talk) 13:26, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge/Redirect it's a plausible redirect. Gigs (talk) 13:34, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge/Redirect and have done. Ray  Talk 15:54, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Either keep or merge; why the proposal for deletion? This is not simply the same as "the" law of large numbers, although some authors use the terms without making a clear distinction. Historically, Borel's law was the first version of the strong law for a special (although common) case. See and . Another common name for Borel's (strong) law is "Borel's theorem". If it's made a merge, it should leave a .  --Lambiam 22:58, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I didn't know that, Lambian, and that article didn't really explain it, at least not in a non-technical way. Now I know - and knowing is half the battle.Dondegroovily (talk) 00:47, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.