Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Borganism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:51, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Borganism
Non-notable, bordering on OR and neologism. Ironically, it has the move to Wiktionary template on it. TrackerTV (CW|Castform|Green Valley) 01:05, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Wow, how totally unlike anything I've seen on Star Trek. --Xrblsnggt 01:35, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Gazpacho 01:40, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, this is OR and neologism as per nom --- Deville (Talk) 02:06, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. C56C 02:51, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as per WP:CSD GC1 ST47 11:13, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as protologism, and do not transwiki as there is no indication of usage. Geogre 12:20, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete protologism Just zis Guy you know? 00:24, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable protologism. It's not patent nonsense, so it's not a speedy candidate. --Core des at talk. ^_^ 04:51, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a dictionary - Blood red sandman 13:12, 25 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.