Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boring Business Systems


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus. Mailer Diablo 08:11, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Boring Business Systems
Non-notable, does not meet any of the Wikipedia guidelines for notability related to companies Wisd e n17 23:37, 1 June 2006 (UTC) typo
 * Delete per nom. Yanksox 00:36, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn. CP/M 00:47, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per no indication that it meets WP:CORP BigDT 01:03, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per BigDT--Peta 03:57, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Mentioned several times on Opie and Anthony's radio show and on several comedy websites. Google it, provided your mommys will let you teenage punks use the computer. UncleFloyd 04:30, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Noteworthy business, and website. The second thing that comes up in Google when you search for "Boring" that should tell you something. ConeyCyclone 05:11, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep since like others things on this page it meets the standards for notability that the Wikipedia has set forth for listing things. It does not seem like an ad either and it does not seem like a hoax like that Jersey Shore Communications mentioned on here before. I think we should keep it and maybe expand it and make sure that it does not turn into an ad. Plus it has a funny name and a great web site address. As the person above mentioned that it is the second thing you find when you type "boring" into your Google search. That must mean it has some popularity and maybe some importance if Google searching ranks it in such a high place. I hope I did not write too much in my vote here. Nertz 05:22, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable, boring. &mdash; Arthur Rubin |  (talk) 19:37, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Seems to meet WP:CORP, but expansion is needed. FunkyChicken! 04:50, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep it is funny and a real company! Nigel Wick 18:21, 6 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.