Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boring people disorer


 * This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.

The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 16:18, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Boring people disorer and Boring people disorder
Admitted original research, actually. Also highly POV. And the title is misspelled. FreplySpang (talk) 05:21, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Too boring. 24.245.12.39 05:27, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete As per nomination criteria.  Alai 05:53, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete both. POV original research. Megan1967 06:03, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, stupid prank. Slac speak up!  06:19, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Uh, isn't this a speedy? Patent nonsense if ever I saw it. - Mustafaa 12:41, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Un-be-lie-va-ble. Original research, POV, grotesque spelling and grammar, sordid casual writing style, double posted on a personal blog with no copy right notice. I have never seen anything like this on the wiki... Phils 12:50, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete total uselessness. — Sesel wa  06:33, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Deleetzzzzzz... - Skysmith 07:58, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - David Gerard 09:48, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete What Phils said. Dsmdgold 00:28, Apr 6, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, if not outright speedy. Strictly POV crank essay. -- Antaeus Feldspar 22:50, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.