Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boris Amstislavski


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:12, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Boris Amstislavski

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable artist. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 05:38, 29 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Does not meet WP:ARTIST or any other part of WP:BIO. Gtwfan52 (talk) 05:46, 29 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Undecided Lousy article, no clear sourcing, no attempt to explain him as an artist. This article would be no loss if deleted.
 * However if you read the article, rather than just weighing the reflist, then this is an artist with exhibitions on two continents, as well as vague claims to his work being sold and collected in a substantial way. Maybe these don't pan out - they certainly need some sourcing. However this is nowhere near a clear "Delete as just not notable". Andy Dingley (talk) 16:48, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the  list of people-related deletion discussions.  -- Cameron11598  (Talk) 03:10, 30 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per nominator. Not Notable. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 00:02, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 1 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete Marginal notability, horrible article. Plaintive plaintiff (talk) 00:24, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.