Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Born Gold


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. L Faraone  02:41, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Born Gold

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )


 * Delete -The only reliable reference provided is here which cannot be taken as an independent source as written by a forbes user Leor Galil. Dejakh ~ User talk:Dejakh•Special:Contributions/Dejakh 14:47, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete under WP:A7. Artist doesn't appear to have any previous articles and there's no real claim of unique importance. Ducknish (talk) 16:53, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:24, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:24, 23 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. Please see WP:BEFORE. Whether or not the Forbes article can be taken as a reliable source, there are several others that are: Pitchfork album review (there are also a few track reviews there), National Post 'album of the week' review, Hollywood Reporter, brief Allmusic bio, The Guardian, and given that Born Gold is Cecil Frena, these should also be considered coverage of the subject: Boise Weekly, Chicago Reader. --Michig (talk) 18:40, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment Among the above mentioned links except 1 or 2 exceptions either passed as a reference without in depth coverage or written by registered bloggers on the respective sites. I think fails WP:MUSBIO. Dejakh ~ User talk:Dejakh•Special:Contributions/Dejakh 22:48, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Didn't understand any of that. --Michig (talk) 06:48, 24 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep per Michig. Notability established by sources.  I wonder if this article would be more appropriately titled Cecil Frena and reworded accordingly, but that can be left to the usual editorial processes.--Arxiloxos (talk) 19:57, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - appears to meet WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO #1. Additional coverage includes Exclaim!, Beats Per Minute Consequence of Sound, The Phoenix, 'The Stranger'. All in all, there seems to be enough material in professional sources to warrant an article.  Gong   show  05:06, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Notability of the artists not established, recording hasn't reached any notable sales levels.  All I see in the references above are reviews of recordings, but nothing indicating real notability.   PK  T (alk)  01:19, 28 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep I reiewed the first few sources cited by Michig, they are written by professional writers and represent significant coverage. J04n(talk page) 23:12, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.