Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Born Scar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 21:26, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Born Scar

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:N, and WP:V, could not find sufficient reliable sources. Verify tag has been up since July 2007. Most likely a one-hit club DJ? OlEnglish (Talk) 17:29, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
 * A7 He did chart, but Google turns up only false positives. How the heck did he even chart?! Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 17:37, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
 * How does "he did chart" turn into A7? Duffbeerforme (talk) 17:58, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Because there's jack s**t information about him online, nothing else than YouTube videos? Come on, I can find more sources for Redmon & Vale, whose career was just as short-lived and successful chartwise. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 18:10, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Which = delete, not A7 unless you challange and remove charting claim. Duffbeerforme (talk) 19:11, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:41, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
 * You get a tiny bit more - Youtube videos, etc. - if you search for it as one word, which is how he's listed on that Billboard link TPH provides. Still not much. Does a reasonably long appearance on the charts trump the whole "who?" thing? Honestly, I don't think so in this case - without sources, we don't get an article out of the deal. Weak delete Tony Fox (arf!) 17:54, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete although there are some minor concerns over whether the article has some notibility due to their position in the Billboard chart. What I don't like is that the article has barely any context, which makes it rather confusing for readers. It has not assertion of notibility, one could argue. The Earwig  (Talk &#124; Editor review) 18:41, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Niteshift36 (talk) 07:12, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.