Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Born To Die (song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Born to Die (song). ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WP Japan ! 00:57, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Born To Die (song)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non notable future release musical single per WP:CRYSTAL, I redirected per WP:NSONGS which was reverted by article creator. Mo ainm ~Talk  20:31, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  Mo ainm  ~Talk  20:34, 16 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Maybe once it is released it will become notable, but it definitely does not pass GNG or WP:NSONGS right now. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 20:47, 16 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. Released in about 5 weeks, and has already received plenty of coverage:, , , , , . Given the massive interest in Lana Del Rey, the chances of it not generating further coverage are nil, so why bother deleting it only to have it recreated in a few weeks. Leave it and let it grow into a proper article.--Michig (talk) 21:45, 16 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment The same editor has created this article twice. The other one existed at its correct title of Born to Die (song) but was turned into a redirect (rightly or wrongly) until notability could be established. After that, the guy just wrote it again at this title (with the crap capitalisation). Bretonbanquet (talk) 23:09, 16 December 2011 (UTC)


 * All the sources provided are about the video release. Mo ainm  ~Talk  11:49, 17 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Yes, the article's about the song, not the video, and having a video doesn't make the song notable. I'm sure it will become notable, but I don't think that merits an article now. Recreate it when the time comes. Bretonbanquet (talk) 13:14, 17 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Fail WP:NSONGS and WP:GNG. No charts, no awards, a single music video is not enough to sustain an article unless the song itself has received enough coverage from the press. - Saulo  Talk to Me 14:33, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Born to Die (song). changed vote. - Saulo  Talk to Me 17:20, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I already redirected it per WP:NSONGS it was reverted. Mo ainm  ~Talk  20:27, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * We now have two articles about the song. The other one (Born to Die (song)) is better than this one, so I agree we should redirect there. --Michig (talk) 20:36, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * And how does the other one pass Crystal or NSONGS? Mo ainm  ~Talk  21:02, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Looks like someone voted for deletion claiming it fails two guidelines, then immediately re-created the original article and changed his vote. Not terribly helpful, as now we have two articles. Bretonbanquet (talk) 21:11, 22 December 2011 (UTC)


 * It passes WP:GNG and WP:NSONGS via coverage. Have a read of WP:CRYSTAL - it also passes that. While it's unfortunately common for some to misinterpret it as stating that anything with a release date in the future shouldn't have an article, it doesn't say that. It discusses "unverifiable speculation". The only 'future' part of this is the release date, which is verifiable.--Michig (talk) 21:15, 22 December 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.