Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Borneo (Wolfgang Gartner and Aero Chord song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Monstercat Uncaged Vol. 1.  Sandstein  10:31, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Borneo (Wolfgang Gartner and Aero Chord song)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Song did not chart nor was nominated for a major award. Fails WP:NSONG. Jalen Folf  (talk)  06:26, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  Jalen Folf   (talk)  06:26, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Has only 6 references, which is very bare minimum. I would say keep if it had charted, got an award, or did anything of significance, but it did none of those. Micro (Talk) 06:49, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per WP:XY. Barely found anything about the song. ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 11:50, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Neutral I don't know whether these sources are WP:ROUTINE or not, but many are indeed in-depth coverage of this particular song which would make it satisfy WP:BASIC (NSONG is a presumption, not an automatic pass/fail (none of the SNGs are). If something fails NSONG but meets GNG then it should be kept, and if something seemingly meets NSONG but there's no coverage then it should be deleted). Per WP:DIDNTWIN, there's no reason to exclude anything because it didn't win an award or something. Saying that 6 sources are a "bare minimum" is clearly a misapplying of policy, GNG requiring only "multiple" (which is usually interpreted as two or three good ones). RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 18:39, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep (or redirect to Monstercat Uncaged Vol. 1): Changed my vote, per RandomCanadian. I checked the sources and they seem to be reliable since they talk about the song. I believe the article is good enough to pass WP:NSONG ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 01:12, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:42, 4 July 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Britishfinance (talk) 19:02, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect - there are sources but they are from EDM-dedicated websites which I doubt the reliability of. Here is one of the paragraphs from edmtunes: "Who’s ready to get tribal? Good! Because that’s exactly what sort of grooving you’ll be doing to the latest collaboration from Wolfgang Gartner and Aero Chord titled, ‘Borneo.’ Seriously, this latest banger sound like it was produced in the depths of the jungle and will most definitely turn your late night ragers from a regular dance party to an all-out dance expedition!" What? What I'm saying is, these seem like websites that just post links to songs and hype up artists/optimize search engine hits. They also have places for submissions where you can promote your songs: "As EDM Sauce has become one of the leading dance music publications, our writers are experts in the music industry and are actively seeking out the future of EDM." and "EDMTunes prides itself on being an electronic dance music website that consistently provides its readers with the finest records and breaking news on the scene. Our writers are experts in the music industry and actively seek out the next generation of producers that will lead the electronic movement." and "Looking to promote with We Rave You? Whether you’re an artist, record label, festival/event organiser, product/app owner, or anything else, we can help!" I just don't trust these sources and... neither should you.  ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia  talk  13:29, 14 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.