Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Borrowed sunlight


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:00, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Borrowed sunlight

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Incomplete nomination originally started by User:DGG. Contested prod. I also vote delete. Raymie (t • c) 02:21, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. I see nothing on the internet to show that this particular term is frequently used or documented in this context. Wikipedia is WP:NOT a place for things made up one day. This is pretty much just a neologism. I see one or two places using it in a similar context, but not exactly in the way it's phrased here.Tokyogirl79 (talk)
 * Delete. A phrase used occasionally in blogs in the sense meant in the article, and at times in a more literal sense (piped-in sunlight). No reliable sources have picked up on the first usage, nor is the second usage thought of as a concept in its own right. The phrase is not covered as an entity in independent, reliable sources and hence notability does not exist. Churn and change (talk) 04:40, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, no sources whatsoever to show this idea is even in use. Might as well be made up at school one day. J I P  &#124; Talk 17:31, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Neologism, and Wikipedia is not a dictionary.-- xanchester  (t)  22:05, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:43, 30 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NEO.--E8 (talk) 18:09, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Not enough documentation to prove the notability of the usage of this term. — ΛΧΣ  21™  00:24, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.