Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Borsari's Corner, Melbourne


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 23:39, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Borsari's Corner, Melbourne

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG via WP:GEOROAD - no evidence of fulfilling "are presumed to be notable if they have been the subject of multiple published secondary sources which contain significant coverage and are reliable and independent of the subject". Only sources found in WP:BEFORE include a website promoting Melbourne, a Facebook group, and a blog. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 01:06, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Australia.  AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 01:06, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  01:34, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. According to this record from the University of South Australia, it has an entry in The Encyclopedia of Melbourne (Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0521842344) but its not viewable on google. There is this page also from the University of Melbourne.  This lengthy page is from what is described as a "what's on blog" but is on the official Melbourne government site so can probably be accepted as reliable per WP:NEWSBLOG. There is also this, and finally, it has a poem written about it in a published anthology. SpinningSpark 23:09, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:37, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:53, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:53, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep Plenty of sources which I've added to the article including an entry in an encyclopedia which for me makes it a non-starter for deletion. Given how slim this article is, I wouldn't be against a merge with Nino Borsari. Vladimir.copic (talk) 01:07, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. adding on behalf of Lightburst
 * Keep per WP:NEXIST thanks to for adding references to the article. Lightburst (talk) 20:11, 6 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.