Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boruch Szlezinger (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 02:05, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Boruch Szlezinger
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Cliff  Smith 17:19, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Cliff  Smith 17:19, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

No reliable sourcing since this was last deleted at AfD Articles_for_deletion/Boruch_Szlezinger for lacking reliable sources as a BLP. One link to a book was added, but when checking the link for that book it was a book about an entirely different survivor with a different name as seen here. Unfortunately WP:NOTMEMORIAL seems to still apply. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 14:40, 1 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Not deletion because new notoriety from last decision : http://www.twitter.com/BSzlezinger --78.250.199.123 (talk) 17:11, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Doesn't meet notability guidelines due to lack of coverage in Reliable sources, of which Twitter certainly is not.   PK  T (alk)  17:34, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, G4. Slapping on Twitter and a reference that doesn't mention the subject isn't good enough to avoid speedy.  Hairhorn (talk) 18:36, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as G4 - this should never have gone to AfD again - the speedy tag was improperly removed by the page creator. MikeWazowski (talk) 21:26, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete I added the G4 that started this, but I shouldn't have. There were a number of obvious problems with the article and while looking into them I somehow misremebered the prev deletion as having been at the end of July rather than the end of March. I didn't compare the new article to the old article, and just assumed that it would not have substantially changed since I thought that it had been recreated just a day or two after failing its first AFD. Had I not made that mistake I would have instead nominated it for deletion based on WP:MEMORIAL and WP:NOTE. I would also have listed teh page at WP:CP since the article was a bad translation of a French web page. Meters (talk) 00:44, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.