Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Borusa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to List of Doctor Who villains.  Sandstein  06:12, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Borusa

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unsourced, appears to be a minor villain, most of the space is non-free images being used as filler. What little there is of value here is best merged into List of Doctor Who villains.  S ven M anguard  Wha?  05:35, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 16:38, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:14, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:14, 24 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge per nom. Why are we even at AfD if the nom favors a merge? Jclemens (talk) 01:52, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 29 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge: Fairly clear that the nom wanted a merger, and I agree that the character is not notable. Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:15, 29 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge per nom. Sp33dyphil  "Ad astra" 08:03, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment: did anybody look for sources before !voting here? Here's a selection that I found:, , , and even . I'm still undecided about how much of this constitutes significant coverage - what do others think? Alzarian16 (talk) 19:14, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Found in notable episodes, and in books as well. The Telegraph has a bit about him.   Didn't bother looking through the other news results.  That's enough to convince me it should be kept.   D r e a m Focus  18:54, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
 * That would be great information to add to the list page. Doesn't argue his independent notability. I say merge.Zythe (talk) 09:19, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge article is only a brief summary of plot elements from other articles. But importantly a complete lack of referencing including any attempt to establish character is notable. GraemeLeggett (talk) 18:36, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.