Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Borusa (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to List of Doctor Who villains. Liz Read! Talk! 06:42, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Borusa
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Despite being a decently recurring character and notable antagonist in the classic era of the show, I just can't find any good sources referencing Borusa outside of passing mention. I feel it's possible for him to keep his article, but he needs additional sources that I just don't think exist. As of right now, he doesn't meet SIGCOV. Pokelego999 (talk) 00:21, 30 June 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:52, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy,  and Television. Pokelego999 (talk) 00:21, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak keep There's an attempt at secondary coverage here, so I think this should have the opportunity to be built up or at least merged elsewhere. U-Mos (talk) 17:52, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Once again, List of Doctor Who characters can't be a redirect target as it is a redirect. Another suggestion? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:38, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the List of Doctor Who characters. I don't see the attempt at secondary coverage User:U-Mos notes - no reception or analysis section, just plot summary all the way through (backstory, appearances...). Fails WP:GNG. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:52, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete/redirect per Piotrus. I also don't see enough WP:SIGCOV to write a meaningful reception/analysis section. Shooterwalker (talk) 22:38, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Redirect to List of Doctor Who villains (maybe that's what people meant?) The work done on the article is impressive but from the sources I am able to access I would have to agree that they do not clear the WP:SIGCOV threshold that no original research is needed to extract the content. I would say mentions in plot summaries that are then strung into a story of the character are in, or at any rate uncomfortably near, OR territory. -- Visviva (talk) 03:35, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment List of Doctor Who villains is a reasonable redirect target. The target can also be revisited through editing. Shooterwalker (talk) 01:28, 20 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.