Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bos-Brook


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Speedy per no assertion of notability. the_undertow talk  03:18, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Bos-Brook

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I'm not sure whether it's a hoax (I can't find any references) or merely something completely non-notable, but it should go either way. Created by an SPA about a year ago. Also remove BO-BR. - Richfife (talk) 01:47, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per WP:CSD: "No indication of importance/significance". I also find nothing worthwhile in Google's 35 hits. -- A. B. (talk) 02:00, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - No indication of importance/significance, but I'm not sure A7 applies in this case. It's possibly a hoax, as there's no evidence this is the name of the stones - I would call them boundary markers. --Snigbrook ( talk ) 02:37, 5 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.