Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bos planifrons


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Leo Breman (talk) 19:17, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Bos planifrons

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

non-existent species, synonym

This taxon is known from a single skull from Kashmir, and was described along with Bos acutifrons by Lydekker from the same sediments. A few years later he concluded it was a female of the previous species. Leo Breman (talk) 15:24, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:46, 7 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Bos acutifrons. No need to delete. Taxonomic synonyms should be redirects to the accepted name. Plantdrew (talk) 15:59, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect synonym to Bos acutifrons, e.g. see Template:R from alternative scientific name. —Hyperik ⌜talk⌟ 16:01, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Hmmmm, that makes sense. Dang. Wish I thought of that earlier. This AfD stuff was really complicated. Leo Breman (talk) 16:09, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
 * So what now? Leo Breman (talk) 16:11, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
 * There're some steps listed for nominator withdrawal here, if you want to go that route: Articles for deletion —Hyperik ⌜talk⌟ 17:00, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks Hyperik. I'll follow those instructions after dinner. Quite a list again. Kicking myself. Thanks all,  Leo Breman (talk) 17:39, 7 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.