Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bose home audio products


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Without prejudice to renaming or possible merger. Stifle (talk) 15:38, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Bose home audio products

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I declined a PROD by with the rationale falls afoul WP:DIRECTORY, points 5 & 7, and WP:PROMO, point 5. There are certainly problems with this article, however it seems to me there probably is enough coverage of some Bose products to justify some form of stand-alone list. But I'm not sure there is; I consider myself neutral for the vote. User:力 (powera, π,  ν ) 19:10, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. User:力 (powera,  π,  ν ) 19:10, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. User:力 (powera,  π,  ν ) 19:10, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages because they are similarly structured lists of Bose products:

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 🌀 Locomotive207 - talk  🌀  02:43, 28 November 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 11:10, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Week keep A cleanup of the various unsourced claims and promotional statements would be warranted. While I agree there are WP:DIRECTORY concerns (and possibly WP:SYNTH), I am slightly leaning towards keep due to the combined coverage of the products meeting the notability threshold. Also, due to the article sizes, having standalone product page(s) from the main Bose Corporation article is probably warranted. MrsSnoozyTurtle 21:22, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep – What MrsST wrote. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 02:20, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - agree with PROD nom, violates NOTCATALOG/NOTDIR.-KH-1 (talk) 05:53, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge to Bose Corporation - Neither article seems large enough to warrant having separate articles at the moment. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 06:47, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable enough to keep and should remain separate as it appears to have a lot of useful information.--51.7.116.144 (talk) 03:04, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - I understand the argument for merging it to Bose Corporation, although I prefer simply keeping this article because I feel it would needlessly clutter Bose Corporation, while the information is still useful enough and sourced enough to have its own article. Basically, if we merged it, we'd just want to split it again soon after. Definitely don't delete, given the sourcing... I think the sources establish notability pretty well, as does common experience. Fieari (talk) 05:15, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Move to List of Bose home audio products and keep. It's a reasonable spinoff, if properly characterized as a list article. BD2412  T 07:31, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I would certainly not object to renaming the article in this manner, although I'm not certain if this AfD discussion is the best place to propose it. Maybe on the talk page once this is closed? Fieari (talk) 06:46, 7 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep and move to List of Bose home audio products per BD2412. Heartmusic678 (talk) 11:57, 13 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.