Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bosnia and Herzegovina – Estonia relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 04:36, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Bosnia and Herzegovina – Estonia relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

random combination, no resident embassies. Not one bilateral agreement, and very minor trade Estonian govt says In 2006, Bosnia and Herzegovina ranked 89nd among Estonia’s trade partners. and Google news search shows almost nothing LibStar (talk) 10:56, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Nothing special or notable about these two countries' relations. Guy0307 (talk) 11:02, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, basically per nom. Another bilateral relations article for two countries that don't really have bilateral relations.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:57, 6 May 2009 (UTC).
 * Delete per nom. Not surprisingly, this is yet another non-notable bilateral relations that have little or no contact with each other. Cheers.  I 'mperator 12:15, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete At first I thought this was a substitute for "The Weather in London" .... not only non-notable, but extraordinarily so. Collect (talk) 12:26, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of third-party sources establishing notability. - Biruitorul Talk 17:04, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete due to failure to satisfy WP:N and because it is contrary to not a directory. Edison (talk) 18:28, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No secondary sources, no assertion of notability from the primary ones given. -- Blue Squadron  Raven  22:40, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete What is the score of a baseball game before the game begins? Wrong, there's no score. Ed Fitzgerald t / c 11:53, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * NEW EVENTS HAVE MADE THESE AFDs IRRELEVANT We could really use some help with Foreign relations of Argentina by country, the first of many comprimise merges. Eventually these articles will be merged into the "diplomacy of..." articles. Lets all work together to merge these articles instead of arguing about them. So much energy has been wasted in these arguments, which could be used on merging these stub articles onto one page. I strongly encourage the nominator to withdraw the AFD nomination. Thanks. Ikip (talk) 16:35, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete this unsourced stub of a relationship of so little import to its protagonists that they don't bother with embassies in each others capitals, and for which i can find no reliable sources that mention the relationship in any depth at all.Bali ultimate (talk) 21:15, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing whatsoever to imply any kind of notability- or any kind of relationship for that matter. Embassies are in Sweden and Bulgaria respectively. If a country considered another to be diplomatically important, surely it would at least put an embassy there? HJMitchell    You rang?  15:59, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.