Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boston Dodgers (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SNOW  MBisanz  talk 00:12, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Boston Dodgers
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Tried to CSD multiple times, always denied. Previous AfD had an outcome of speedy delete, but the page is still. Here. DELETE Cssiitcic (talk) 21:56, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Per A7 of the CSD. Also an orphan.Cssiitcic (talk) 21:58, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * You voted in this and in the previous AfD so many times that it may seem that you have a problem with this article. Relax. Probably a speedy but I'll wait for a coulpe of votes more. --Tone 22:48, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - amateur team, no indication of notability. Could be a speedy g4? JohnCD (talk) 22:58, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - don't see the notability here; note that G4 won't work here because the previous AFD was closed by the nominator of this one, today. Patience... Tony Fox (arf!) 23:48, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually the reaons that this can't be deleted under G4 is that it can only be used if an article was deleted in a fullly completed AFD and not speedied. The reason for this is, first, any article that has been speedied and is similar enough to be deleted Under G4 can simply be deleted under the original criteria. Conquencently, if the new article different enough for the original speedy deletion criteria not to apply it would cleary not be a vaild G4. In short, if this aricle is no different that the first time A7 could be used again and if not G4 would be invalid.--76.71.211.177 (talk) 03:18, 6 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. Being an amateur baseball team is not an inherent claim to notability, and this article has no sources. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:17, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions.  —Borgarde (talk) 13:58, 5 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.