Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boston Park Plaza Hotel & Towers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep Eluchil404 09:08, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Boston Park Plaza Hotel & Towers

 * — (View AfD)

Contested Prod. I still think this article does not assert enough notability to be included. Delete. -- lucasbfr talk 22:18, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - One of the most grand and historic hotels of Boston (and probably North America). Member of the National Trust for Historic Preservation. . Passes at least WP:LOCAL --Oakshade 00:49, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per Oakshade. That membership make it notable enough. Esurnir 01:19, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, one of the original Statler Hotels, renovated in recent years. Potential references abound. --Dhartung | Talk 06:40, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - reference within the National Trust for Historic Preservation makes it notable enough. The hotel doesn't appear to be listed on the National Register of Historic Places, but it appears to be within the Back Bay Historic District.  (Or is it?  I can't tell by looking at the boundaries, because they aren't exact.  Are there any locals who know?)  --Elkman - (Elkspeak) 22:15, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. As a person who lives near it, I can assure the other editors that this is an important hotel. The hotel itself is notable, but the article is weak. That might change. The hotel is not technically in the Back Bay Historic District (the District includes buildings north of Boylston and west of Arlington). If knowing the hotel's historic preservation status were the key to this debate, I could call someone, and eventually find a reliable source. I did see one comment turn up in a web search: "Hotel built in 1928 and some ADA modifications were not possible due to historic preservation.", at . EdJohnston 00:39, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.