Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bothel, Cumbria


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep As per consensus, with no calls for deletion outside of the nominator. A non-admin closure. And Adoil Descended (talk) 01:33, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Bothel, Cumbria

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

No sources, dubious content Labrat256 23:13, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 20 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - Looks like a real and distinct population center to me.  "Dubious content" is not a reason to delete an entire article but to improve it and the only "dubious content" I saw was the sentence "People flight here", which was added by an anon about a month ago and was just removed by me. --Oakshade (talk) 02:05, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Clearly exists (look at the map) and all verified settlements are generally held to be notable, however small. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:03, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - The article has been cleaned-up as of this post. A source has been added. Per WP:FIVEPILLARS, Wikipedia also functions as a gazetteer. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:16, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep — agree with Necrothesp. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 19:09, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep -- Google maps celarly show that the place exists. I cannot see any obviously dubious content.  Peterkingiron (talk) 15:57, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.