Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Botopedia.org


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  07:51, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Botopedia.org

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Content seems to be purely commercial and lacking encyclopedic value Ddosguru (talk) 18:21, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:24, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:25, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:25, 8 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete- yeah, the sourcing available in the article doesn't seem to justify this, and I can find nothing much else. Reyk  YO!  06:19, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔   20:02, 15 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Subject fails WP:WEBSITE. Nothing came up on a Google that remotely hints at notability. -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:51, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.