Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bots (edi)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 01:49, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Bots (edi)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Contested PROD, see reasoning here. This article is about a not notable software product. This product has a lot of GHits; but, I could not find any reliable sources in the mix and certainly none that are independent and cover the topic to any depth. I though I found one book with an author, two editors, an ISBN, everything until I realized that it says it is "Content by WIKIPEDIA". How they got 112 pages on this topic from Wikipedia beats me. This subject does not meet the general notability guidelines; is unverifiable; has no reliable sources; and seems here only to promote; therefore, I propose deletion. WTucker (talk) 05:29, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete borderline G11 speedy as advertisement. Just a brochure-like list of features, wouldn't even make a good starting point for a real article. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:32, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 20:41, 24 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - Haven't been able to find anything. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:47, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.