Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bottle Rocket Studios


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that the article does not meet the notability guidelines. Davewild (talk) 07:10, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Bottle Rocket Studios

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable company lacking significant coverage in reliable sources. Identical article |draft] declined by. Philg88 ♦talk 16:10, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - It's unfortunate they abandoned the AFC process. Non-notable via WP:CORP. All sources are either primary or just press releases. Sulfurboy (talk) 16:26, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Please Keep - It came to my attention a few weeks ago that this page is long overdue for an update. I am the new website and social media manager of Bottle Rocket Studios. The only reason I state this is to avoid a conflict of interest as it is not my interest, but my job. Please let me know if there are any steps that should be taken to further prevent deletion or if I should simply create a new page.
 * The abandonment of the AFC process was due to the fact that I realized I could submit a request to change the title of the page. The new page I attempted to create (titled Bottle Rocket Studios, that I believe you are referring to) was a poor attempt at changing the name before I had thoroughly explored all courses of action.
 * To give some backstory, my original intent was 2 fold: 1. to create a profile that could be used within our marketing department so that changes could be made when needed without having to go through me every time. 2. I made a poor assumption that making a company branded account name would show that the edits and new page I attempted to make were going to from a reliable source. I understand that I broke several community standards in doing so and am working to make amends.
 * I apologize for my blatant disregard of community standards as I attempted to quickly make amendments to the page. I will continue to read up on the community and content guidelines and plan to avoid any similar situation in the future. (I also apologize if this is not a standard response, but I wanted to get a statement on the post before this had a chance to go any further) BricePraslicka (talk) 19:25, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment This article is not a "company profile" like you suggest, but instead an article that anyone can edit. If you're here to build a company profile, then use a social network or official website. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia for neutral tone articles on notable things. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:34, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment Thank you for the clarification. If I were to rewrite the page (as I planned to do anyway) to speak of the innovations that Bottle Rocket has made to the mobile and virtual reality industry, would that potentially be notable enough for a page? As I stated earlier, I have been working to bring myself up to speed on this whole process and the community guidelines. I do however, at the moment, seem to not understand what makes some companies notable and not others. I had the understanding that Wikipedia was an encyclopedia of knowledge, not a place for only notable topics. Regardless, thank you again for the clarification and understanding. Also, thank you  for the addition of articles related to community standards that must be met. BricePraslicka (talk) 20:29, 8 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Not notable, fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:31, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:04, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:04, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:04, 8 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:CORP ukexpat (talk) 12:50, 9 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.