Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bottlecap shooting


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, invoking WP:SNOW based on the shape of the debate below. Hiding T 00:18, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Bottlecap shooting

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This is a WP:DICDEF followed by personal observations and then instructions removable under WP:NOTHOWTO. Except that it lacks the tastelessness factor, it reminds me of the Hand fart article that was deleted a few days ago. —Largo Plazo (talk) 01:19, 7 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - per WP:NOTHOWTO. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 01:24, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not satisfy WP:GNG. --Anshuk (talk) 01:30, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * WP:SNOW Delete: per WP:NOTHOWTO and WP:DICDEF. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 01:45, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NFT (while we're throwing around applicable acronyms) --Jayron32. talk . contribs 04:28, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * WP:NFT isn't applicable, even if the kid himself was being sincere when he wrote on my talk page that this was some "rare" information he was trying to share with the world. I was amused&#8212;I wondered whether he thought his friends had invented it. We were doing this 30 years ago.—Largo Plazo (talk) 11:35, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * You're thinking of Skully, aren't you? Uncle G (talk) 12:46, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Nope, never heard of that. I'm just talking about the simple act of snapping a bottle cap!—Largo Plazo (talk) 12:58, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete this how-to guide. Looks like snow indeed.  Cliff smith  talk  05:34, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * WP:SNOW this one already, please. PLEASE.  JBsupreme (talk) 06:13, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 *  Delete Shoot it as a how-to guide. Alexius08 (talk) 08:33, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Shoot, WP:NOTHOWTO. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 10:23, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Blast it with a bottlecap in snowy weather. MuZemike  14:45, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Kill it It is a how to, the subject is trivial, it is entirely original research (though calling it "research" is stretching the concept beyond breaking point) and the writing style is horrible. The article has absolutely zero merit! Roger (talk) 15:40, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a how-to guide, article is based on original research, et cetera.   coccyx bloccyx  (toccyx)  17:40, 7 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.