Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bottom up thought leadership


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. speedy, snow, IAR. StarM 02:25, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Bottom up thought leadership

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unreferenced OR essay. KurtRaschke (talk) 21:55, 13 November 2008 (UTC)


 * SPEEDY DELETE NOW NOW NOW!!! :) Yikes. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:19, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Clear cut (un)original research. Unusual? Quite  TalkQu  22:30, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Clearly unreferenced original research. There are virtually no useful Google hits for "Bottom up thought leadership".  Linguist At Large  00:50, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong delete — not sure that this falls under any criteria (even though someone has already tagged it for speedy, which indicates that some users choose to ignore the rules, which is OK), but yeah. Unverifiable essay which, in its current state, clearly does not belong in the encyclopedia. MuZemike  ( talk ) 01:10, 14 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.