Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boulder Magazine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:33, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Boulder Magazine

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No evidence of notability. Only source is to itself. Seen several attempts to add promotional content. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 01:13, 17 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Comment - agree with nominator's notes that this magazine has no source but itself, which seems odd. It's online only, and the publisher DueSouth Publishing, LLC has other online magazines.  Other than that, I'm not sure there is anything out there on this magazine or its parent company. Boulder Magazine online site. — Maile  (talk) 01:56, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media and Colorado. AllyD (talk) 06:58, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. A search brought up no secondary sources on this magazine. It's not notable. Cortador (talk) 21:34, 17 September 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.