Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boulder opal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was merge and redirect. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihon joe 23:30, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Boulder_opal

 * — (View AfD)

The page really isn't about Boulder opal itself, it is more about the region in which it is mined and the mining process. The discussion page even says that it is copy-and-pasted. I tried to wikify it, but realized that it really should be deleted. There was a bit of first-person writing that I removed, but there still might be POV that I missed. It's pretty much redundant with Opal. I think that this might be useful as a section under Opal, but does not deserve its own page. Maybe we could merge or redirect it. Sbrools ( talk .  contribs ) 17:32, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Remove copyvio with extreme prejudice! If what Benn Newman posted is correct, I withdraw my vote. RedRollerskate 17:42, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. The permission for use of this work has been archived in the Wikimedia OTRS system. Please contact a person with an account on the system to confirm the permission. --Benn Newman 18:50, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect to Opal. Yuser31415 22:56, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.