Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boulevard de la Zone


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was KEEP. J I P | Talk 06:58, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Boulevard de la Zone
Not Notable, just a description of a street. There is not room for descriptions of every road in the world here. People can look such info up on Goolge Maps Jimbo68 10:13, 25 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment I put this up for speedy deletion yesterday, but it was somehow kept. Jimbo68 10:17, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete There is no explanation as to how this could be of interest and all of the links on the page are red. 86.129.153.190 10:48, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Suggest editors review nominators speedy tagging of Jan Boerstoel and history of edits on Steve Wisdom and other financial articles before deciding on Boulevard de la Zone.   Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  12:00, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - this article is on a street important for its representation of the location of Paris' former fortifications, 1920's HBM's and more recently-constructed péripherique circular highway. It will be expanded.  T HE P ROMENADER  14:17, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as creator of the article   Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  15:52, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment #2 While I have submitted another of Dlyons493's articles for deletion, this is because I feel he has written two bad articles. I aplolgise if he feels I am being unfair to him.  I feel this article can be judged on its own merits as to if it meets the criteria for usefulness, and notability. Jimbo68 11:01, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Not useful. JeffMurph 09:58, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * comment - I find it odd that JeffMurph has done little else in his few Wiki edits outside of voting for deletion. Is this commonplace?  T HE P ROMENADER  16:52, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.