Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boulou Ebanda de B'béri (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe deckertalk 02:40, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Boulou Ebanda de B'béri
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete. WP:BLP of a filmmaker and academic, written like a résumé rather than an encyclopedia article and referenced entirely to primary sources with no evidence of reliable source coverage about him shown at all. The potential for notability per WP:CREATIVE exists here, but this article as written isn't showing or sourcing it properly. There's also a probable conflict of interest, as the article was first created by "Boulou~enwiki". Note that earlier nomination was closed "no consensus". Bearcat (talk) 17:55, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 17:56, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 17:56, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:38, 13 February 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete a non-notable individual.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:22, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:57, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:46, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:47, 23 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. Article is a CV, orphan, and apparently an autobio from a SPA acct whose edits service this article exclusively. Impact well below what we now consider even borderline for academics. Agricola44 (talk) 17:47, 23 February 2017 (UTC).
 * Delete for the same reasons I already !voted to delete in the 2011 AfD: no evidence of academic impact and no evidence of newsworthiness as a filmmaker. And the festival du film pan africain that listed him as a judge and was cited as evidence of notability by two of the three keep !votes in 2011 is now a deadlink so, if anything, his case has only become weaker since then. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:18, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - as per above. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   22:22, 27 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.