Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bound in relationship

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was 3 Delete / 1 Copyvio -> Delete -- AllyUnion (talk) 13:14, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Bound in relationship
Original research, not an encyclopedia article. RickK 06:36, Jan 26, 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete the current nonsense essay from page history, then redirect to master/slave relationship or to sexual bondage. jni 07:02, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete&mdash;nothing but personal essay/proselytizing. Postdlf 07:36, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is born into a covenantal relationship with its editors. Of course this relationship is supposed to grow and mature over time, but whether it does or not, the fact of the relationship is established at the beginning. When growth and maturity are missing, the reason can always be attributed to inappropriate article creation. Or something. Delete; the creator is welcome to post it to actual message boards, a personal website, etc. Samaritan 08:20, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Copyvio. I've submitted it to copyright problems. Uncle G 14:59, 2005 Jan 26 (UTC)