Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boundaries · International Architectural Magazine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. v/r - TP 14:26, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Boundaries · International Architectural Magazine

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A magazine with the first issue released July 2011, does not appear to be notable, no sources to suggest it is, and spa's are repeatedly restoring promotional content Jac 16888  Talk 14:58, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I found the article brief and written in clear language, without promotional content. I don't know about the spa's Jac is talking about, but I've read the magazine (I'm architect and I read a lot of architecture magazines each month). Notability can be acquired leaving people expanding the article instead of simple quickly deleting it. I suggest to keep it and leave people decide about. Kim2371 (talk) 15:16, 2 August 2011 (UTC) — Kim2371 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Delete - Non notable magazine, with limited distribution range. Eduemoni↑talk↓  17:34, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 19:14, 3 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete per lack of third-party sources, as none were found on both Yahoo! and Google. SwisterTwister   talk  06:33, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.