Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boundless (production company)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:27, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Boundless (production company)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable and fails WP:NCORP. Repeatedly created after deletions and redirects, see log. Sources are either routine releases or trivial mentions discussing splits and mergers falling under standard notices, brief announcements, and routine coverage. WP:BEFORE found only routine news on merging, see 1.  VickKiang  (talk)  01:14, 2 October 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  03:19, 9 October 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Already deleted once by PROD but contested so is not eligible for Soft Deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:46, 16 October 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:25, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Companies,  and United Kingdom.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:44, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. The sources given don't meet the significant coverage aspect of WP:GNG. I suppose I could see a redirect to Naked (production company), but I'm not sold on that. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 04:16, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete Fails WP:NCORP with no significant coverage in independent reliable sources. In fact, I do not think that Naked (production company) is notable either, so I will AfD it. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 04:30, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect: An article describing a succession of divisional rebrands within Fremantle (company) and the productions which were for a time allocated to this particular operating unit. Industry coverage based on the associated announcements is not, I think, of sufficient significance to demonstrate notability. Looking at this across the board, there is some coverage of the unit restructurings at Fremantle (company) and list coverage of productions at List of Fremantle productions for this and other Fremantle subsidiaries, which I think is sufficient, though a redirect to one or other could be an option. AllyD (talk) 07:34, 23 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.