Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bouwfonds


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. This is a Secret account 00:51, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Bouwfonds

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Expired prod. For a foreign (to me, being from the US) I was hesistant to delete based on notability. Some evidence of its size in the Netherlands (70,000+ google count). Brought here for more discussion. Esprit15d (۝ • ۞ • ▲ ) 14:36, 12 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete This article about a real estate company does not assert the importance of the subject except for the organization's size. It certainly appears non notable. --Stormbay 17:35, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 15:35, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
 * What? You say a company with a revenue of half a billion € is not notable? - Thank you, Esprit for sensitive handling. Keep, but expand. I added interwiki links.--Peter Eisenburger 06:01, 16 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep view. I see no reason to delete the article at this point. Looking at the Dutch Wikipedia there is material that can be worked in for example from here. There are also plenty of news reports for example here. If kept, someone knowledgeable needs to rewrite since there is a complex history that needs unravelling. Bridgeplayer (talk) 21:07, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per Bridgeplayer. Bearian (talk) 23:56, 21 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.