Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bowman's Strategy Clock


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) buidhe 20:03, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Bowman's Strategy Clock

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This has sat with a notability tag for 12 years. I could not establish that it does meet WP:NOTABILITY, but I suspect it could be borderline, so bringing it here. Boleyn (talk) 07:25, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:50, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak delete I'm mixed. Lots of stuff about it come up in a Google search, but most of it seems like junk, blog posts, or press releases. The person who created the article only really edited one other article which was to insert a citation to this one. So, I think it was created for marking purposes. Therefore, it's a weak delete. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:25, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buidhe 00:45, 3 March 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Analysis of provided sources
 * Keep Seems to be a valid theory in economics. I get the vibe that its taught in college economics courses, based on, , and . I'm not an economist, but I'd wager that this is covered in an economics/marketing textbook somewhere. Of course, we're unlikely to just find it by searching google, since textbooks are not cheap nor accessible (WP:NEXIST). But given that I could find a bunch of quick google sources, the images results are just chock full of visualizations of the "clock", and that Bowman's original paper is well cited, I think this is worthy of a keep. CaptainEek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 05:44, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <b style="color: black;">Night</b><b style="color: black">fury</b> 11:08, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - This isn't an economics piece, it's related to marketing and finance and it is self-sourced. I had my Wak-a-Mole mallet at the ready. Much to my surprise, this is a finance concept that is substantially covered by multiple, published pieces of presumed reliability... See, for example, THIS on AQA.org. Many multiple instances of its use in financial analysis. Go figure. GNG pass. Carrite (talk) 11:38, 11 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.