Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bowman's Strategy Clock (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion.  MBisanz  talk 02:31, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Bowman's Strategy Clock
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This has been in CAT:NN for 12 years. It has been to AfD a couple of months ago, but there was limited participation and no consensus. I am really hoping this time we can resolve it either way. Good arguments were put forward last time for keep, but I still think it doesn't quite go over the threshold of notability. Boleyn (talk) 11:17, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:41, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

DELETE. Not notable and seemingly trivial. Donaldd23 (talk) 18:19, 30 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.